[2022 수능특강 영어] 11강 6번 지문분석/한줄해석

 

 

2022 수능특강 영어 11강 6번 지문분석 / 한줄해석 

소재 : 철학적 담론의 특징 

 

질문이나 오류는 댓글 남겨주세요 by 스텔라쌤

 

 

[ 지문분석 ]

출처 EBS 수능특강

 

 

반응형

 

 

 

[ 한줄해석 ]

 

Even though philosophy is a communal enterprise dedicated to exploring our justification for using the criteria we use to distinguish between, for example, moral and immoral actions, truth and falsity, reality and appearance, and more, philosophical discourse proceeds by argumentation.

 

비록 철학이 예를 들어, 도덕적인 행동과 부도덕한 행동, 진실과 거짓, 실체와 외관 등을 구별하기 위해서 우리가 쓰는 기준을 사용하는 것에 대한 정당한 이유를 탐구하는 데 바쳐지는 공동의 사업이기는 하지만, 철학적 담론은 논증으로 진행된다. 

 

So a philosopher might put forward “correspondence to reality” as a criterion for distinguishing a true belief from a false one.

 

그래서 어떤 철학자는 참된 믿음과 거짓된 믿음을 구별하기 위한 기준으로 ‘현실과의 부합’을 제안할지도 모른다. 

 

In order to determine whether that is an adequate criterion, other philosophers would critically discuss that proposal, and one might criticize it by pointing out that we have no means of telling whether or not an idea corresponds to reality because our access to reality is always mediated by our ideas.

 

그것이 적절한 기준인지를 알아내기 위해서, 다른 철학자들은 그 제안을 비판적으로 논할 것이며, 어떤 사람은 현실에 대한 접근이란 항상 생각에 의해 매개되기 때문에 어떤 생각이 현실에 부합하는지 아닌 지를 구별할 수 있는 수단이 없다는 점을 지적함으로써 그것을 비판할지도 모른다. 

 

And that’s exactly how a philosophical discussion develops, with all the parties to it advocating their own point of view (although they can jump ship and switch to the other side!) at the same time that they are committed to jointly figuring out the correct answer to the question.

그리고 철학적 토론은 정확히 그런 방식으로 전개되는데, 그 토론의 모든 당사자들은 그 질문에 대한 정답을 공동으로 찾아내는 데 전념하는 동시에, (비록 자기가 속한 편을 떠나 반대편으로 바뀔 수 있지만!) 자신의 관점을 옹호한다.